Difference between revisions of "About"

From Open Transactions
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Related Systems: fixed monetas link)
(updated centralization notes)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
* Without the special mechanism that makes this possible, ''all parties would otherwise be forced to store all receipts forever''.
 
* Without the special mechanism that makes this possible, ''all parties would otherwise be forced to store all receipts forever''.
 
* Nyms and Asset Types have consistent IDs across all OT servers, since the ID is formed by hashing the relevant contract or public key.
 
* Nyms and Asset Types have consistent IDs across all OT servers, since the ID is formed by hashing the relevant contract or public key.
 +
 +
 +
<big>'''Is Open-Transactions [[CENTRALIZED|centralized]]?'''</big>
 +
* The vision is not of a central server that you must trust. Rather, the vision is of federated servers you don't have to trust.
 +
* Typical centralized servers have power over their users, but in OT, '''no server has power over the clients it serves''', because:
 +
* An OT server cannot change user transactions—it merely notarizes them.
 +
* Anyone can operate an OT server, and users can go to any OT server to notarize transactions. Thus OT servers compete with each other to attract users to use their notary services.
 +
* Anyone can download an OT client, and use it to execute transactions on any OT server, or any group of OT servers.
 +
* OT uses triple-signed receipts, so transaction parties have independent cryptographic proof of transactions and balances.
 +
* OT servers do not store user assets. Rather, cryptocurrencies are stored in voting pools so the server can't steal them.
 +
 +
In every way, '''the user is in control, not the server'''—even when you're using servers you do not trust. These characteristics generate a '''federated''' network architecture—similar to the internet, and it has the same virtues as the internet—openness, decentralization, resilience, censorship-resistance, and user control.
 +
 +
The community behind OT is strongly committed to developing systems that give users full control over their own assets and information.
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 106: Line 120:
  
 
[[Components and GNU Licensing]]
 
[[Components and GNU Licensing]]
 
-----
 
 
Is Open-Transactions '''[[CENTRALIZED|centralized]]?'''
 
 
The vision is not of a central server that you must trust. Rather, the vision is of federated servers you don't have to trust.
 
  
 
-----
 
-----

Revision as of 11:22, 3 October 2014