Talk:Notary (voting pools)

From Open Transactions
Revision as of 12:55, 24 September 2014 by Haarts (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The third paragraph under 'Responsibilities' talks about a HF exchange. But the sentences that follow pertain to a regular exchange. Perhaps all I'm saying is; why a High Frequency exchange?

The sentences that follow pertain to both types of exchanges, really.

The initial users of voting pools are going to be exchanges that have their own order matching engine and will not be using native OT functionality for that.

Mentioning HF trading is an example that's there to establish that voting pools can support the needs of that type of exchange.

Justusranvier (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

OK, I found it a bit confusing. Perhaps making that explicit would help. But it's clear to me now.

--Haarts (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2014 (UTC)