Difference between revisions of "Talk:Transaction Construction Algorithm (voting pools)"

From Open Transactions
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Is roundID necessary in the algorithm?)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
We add the roundID to this object, but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Is it needed at all?
 
We add the roundID to this object, but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Is it needed at all?
 +
 +
[[User:Justusranvier|Justusranvier]] ([[User talk:Justusranvier|talk]]) 15:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
It's needed to match up withdrawalstatus objects with siglist objects.

Revision as of 15:41, 26 September 2014

Larshesel (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

In the preparation step it is mentioned that we create a withdrawal status object which is referenced throughout the algorithm.

We add the roundID to this object, but it does not seem to be used anywhere. Is it needed at all?

Justusranvier (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

It's needed to match up withdrawalstatus objects with siglist objects.